Dogma disputed: can aggressively lowering blood pressure in hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease be dangerous?

Notes: 

U or J phenomenon of mortality;

pulse pressure increased by medications - normal is 40 or less

reduced diastolic associated with heart attacks.

diastolic below 60 had 3x the heart attack rate and dramatically increases risk of irregular heart beat

beta blockers increase stroke risk and overall mortality

TitleDogma disputed: can aggressively lowering blood pressure in hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease be dangerous?
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2006
AuthorsMesserli FH, Mancia G, Conti RC, Hewkin AC, Kupfer S, Champion A, Kolloch R, Benetos A, Pepine CJ
JournalAnnals of internal medicine
Volume144
Issue12
Pagination884-93
Date Published2006 Jun 20
ISSN1539-3704
KeywordsAged, Antihypertensive Agents, Atenolol, Blood Pressure, Cause of Death, Coronary Artery Disease, Diastole, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hypertension, Incidence, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Risk Factors, Stroke, Treatment Outcome, Verapamil
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because coronary perfusion occurs mainly during diastole, patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) could be at increased risk for coronary events if diastolic pressure falls below critical levels.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether low blood pressure could be associated with excess mortality and morbidity in this population.

DESIGN: A secondary analysis of data from the International Verapamil-Trandolapril Study (INVEST), which was conducted from September 1997 to February 2003.

SETTING: 862 sites in 14 countries.

PATIENTS: 22 576 patients with hypertension and CAD. Interventions: Patients from INVEST were randomly assigned to a verapamil sustained-release- or atenolol-based strategy; blood pressure control and outcomes were equivalent.

MEASUREMENTS: An unadjusted quadratic proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the relationship between average on-treatment blood pressure and risk for the primary outcome (all-cause death, nonfatal stroke, and nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI]), all-cause death, total MI, and total stroke. A second model adjusted for differences in baseline covariates.

RESULTS: The relationship between blood pressure and the primary outcome, all-cause death, and total MI was J-shaped, particularly for diastolic pressure, with a nadir at 119/84 mm Hg. After adjustment, the J-shaped relationship persisted between diastolic pressure and primary outcome. The MI-stroke ratio remained constant over a wide blood pressure range, but at a lower diastolic blood pressure, there were substantially more MIs than strokes. An interaction between decreased diastolic pressure and history of revascularization was observed; low diastolic pressure was associated with a relatively lower risk for the primary outcome in patients with revascularization than in those without revascularization.

LIMITATIONS: This is a post hoc analysis of hypertensive patients with CAD.

CONCLUSIONS: The risk for the primary outcome, all-cause death, and MI, but not stroke, progressively increased with low diastolic blood pressure. Excessive reduction in diastolic pressure should be avoided in patients with CAD who are being treated for hypertension.

Alternate JournalAnn. Intern. Med.
PubMed ID16785477
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon
Get email updates
Recipes. upcoming classes.